Oh Yeah, Developmental Biology!

RSS

Posts tagged with "biology"

I start college in August, and I wanted to know if you have any tips for new biology majors?

Yes. Be prepared to study hard and party hard :D

9am lectures are the worst, so buy a Dictaphone as you will fall asleep at some point and trying to decipher sleep written notes at a later date will have you thinking you work at Bletchley Park. 

But on a more serious note, new scientist is a good place for general articles. Get you books second hand off various sites or on offers posted round uni. This will save you a fortune!! 

Join your biology (life science/whatever its called) society. 

Generally just be social and have fun :D science is fun after all :) 

I’m sure people will have more advice to add so check the notes.

Jul 2
Rainbow ‘bird’s nest’ MRI reveals how a heart beats

(Image: Laurence Jackson)
This is not a colourful bird’s nest: it is the collection of muscle fibres that work together to make a mouse heart beat.
The vivid MRI picture was captured using diffusion tensor imaging, which tracks the movement of fluid through tissue, using different colours to represent the orientation of the strands.
The fibres, which spiral around the left ventricular cavity, curve in different directions around the inside and outside walls of the chamber. When the fibres pull against one another, the result is an upwards twisting motion that forces blood to be pumped out.
The image, which was the overall winner of the Research Images as Artcompetition at University College London last year, is currently on display at the Summer Science Exhibition taking place at the Royal Society in London. It is part of an exhibit showcasing future imaging techniques that will allow us to peer inside the body.

Rainbow ‘bird’s nest’ MRI reveals how a heart beats

(Image: Laurence Jackson)

This is not a colourful bird’s nest: it is the collection of muscle fibres that work together to make a mouse heart beat.

The vivid MRI picture was captured using diffusion tensor imaging, which tracks the movement of fluid through tissue, using different colours to represent the orientation of the strands.

The fibres, which spiral around the left ventricular cavity, curve in different directions around the inside and outside walls of the chamber. When the fibres pull against one another, the result is an upwards twisting motion that forces blood to be pumped out.

The image, which was the overall winner of the Research Images as Artcompetition at University College London last year, is currently on display at the Summer Science Exhibition taking place at the Royal Society in London. It is part of an exhibit showcasing future imaging techniques that will allow us to peer inside the body.


Short-tailed fruit bat (Carollia perspicillata)
Lateral (top) and ventral (bottom) views of stage 19 bat embryos as viewed by reflected light (left) or after alcian blue staining and clearing (right). 
photo by Chris Cretekos and Richard Behringer

Short-tailed fruit bat (Carollia perspicillata)

Lateral (top) and ventral (bottom) views of stage 19 bat embryos as viewed by reflected light (left) or after alcian blue staining and clearing (right). 

photo by Chris Cretekos and Richard Behringer

The hologenome: A new view of evolution

Far from being passive hangers-on, symbiotic microbes may shape the evolution of the plants and animals that play host to them

link

Read More

Physics not biology may be key to beating cancer

Billions of dollars spent on cancer research have yielded no great breakthrough yet. There are other ways to attack the problem, says physicist Paul Davies

AS THE US faces up to its “fiscal cliff” of massive spending cuts, a major issue is burgeoning health costs. High on the list of those costs is cancer therapy, with the clamour for hugely expensive drugs - many of which have little or no clinical benefit - set to grow as baby boomers age.

Cancer research swallows billions of dollars a year, but the life expectancy for someone diagnosed with cancer that has spread to other parts of the body has changed little over several decades. Therapy is often a haphazard rearguard action against the inevitable. And the search for a general cure remains as elusive as ever.

Recognising this depressing impasse, the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) took a bold step in 2008 by deciding that the field might benefit from the input of mathematicians and physical scientists, whose methods and insights differ markedly from those of cancer biologists.

After all, the history of science teaches us that major advances come when a subject’s conceptual foundations are revised. Maybe progress is slow because we are looking at the problem in the wrong way? So the NCI created 12 centres for physical science and oncology. Four years on, they are starting to bear fruit, for example, by showing how the elastic properties of cells change as cancer progresses.

In the 19th century, living organisms were widely regarded as machines infused by vital forces. Biologists eventually came to realise that cells are not some sort of magic matter, but complex networks of chemical reaction pathways. Then came the genetics revolution, which describes life in the informational language of instructions, codes and signalling. Mainstream research today focuses almost exclusively on chemical pathways or genetic sequencing. For example, drugs are designed to block reaction pathways implicated in cancer. The cancer genome atlas is amassing terabytes of data in which people hope to spot some sort of mutational pattern. But while of great scientific interest, such projects have not led to the much-anticipated breakthrough.

Why? There are fundamental obstacles: living cells, including cancer cells, are a bottomless pit of complexity, and cancer cells are notoriously heterogeneous. A reductionist approach that seeks to unravel the details of every pathway of every cancer cell type might employ researchers for decades and consume billions of dollars, with little impact clinically. Linear chains of cause and effect rarely work in biology, which is dominated by elaborate networks of interactions such as feedback and control loops.

There is, however, another way of looking at cells. In addition to being bags of chemicals and information processing systems, they are also physical objects, with properties such as size, mass, shape, elasticity, free energy, surface stickiness and electrical potential. Cancer cells contain pumps, levers, pulleys and other paraphernalia familiar to physicists and engineers. Furthermore, many of these properties are known to change systematically as cancer progresses in malignancy.

First, though, we need to get away from the notion of a cure, and think of controlling or managing cancer. Like ageing, cancer is not so much a disease as a process. And just as the effects of ageing can be mitigated without a full understanding of the process, the same could be true of cancer.

Many accounts misleadingly describe cancer as rogue cells running amok. In fact, once cancer is triggered, it is usually very deterministic in its behaviour. Primary tumours are rarely the cause of death. It is when cancer spreads around the body and colonises other organs that the patient’s prospects deteriorate sharply.

This so-called metastasis is a well characterised, if poorly understood, physical process. Cells migrate from the primary tumour to blood vessels, which they enter through spaces in the vessel walls. Then, swept along in the torrent, they circulate in the blood system, sometimes individually, sometimes “rafting” in gangs like Lilliputian raiders, stuck together by blood platelets. A fraction of these migrants get jammed in tiny blood vessels called venules or, more spectacularly, roll along the vessel wall and fling out little molecular grappling hooks called cadherins. Thus anchored against the blood flow, they inveigle their way into the nearest organ.

During this process, the physical properties and shape of the cells can change dramatically. Generally, cancer cells are soft and misshapen compared with healthy cells of the same type, a transformation that may affect their motility and increase their invasive potential. Cancer cells are adept at building nests in foreign tissue, by altering the structure and physical properties of the host organ’s supporting extracellular matrix, and recruiting local healthy cells. There are also hints that a primary tumour may send out chemical signals ahead of time to prepare the physical and chemical ground for the colonists.

Although metastasis seems fiendishly efficient, most disseminated cancer cells never go on to cause trouble. The vast majority die, and the survivors may lie dormant for years or even decades, either as individual, quiescent, cells in the bone marrow, or as micro-metastases in tissues, before erupting into proliferating secondary tumours. Hence the many cases of “cancer survivors” who die when the same cancer returns with enhanced malignancy years or even decades after a primary tumour has been removed.

The spread of cancer presents many possibilities for clinical intervention once the dream of a cure has been abandoned. For example, if the period of dormancy can be extended by, say, a factor of five, many breast, colon and prostate cancers would cease to be a health issue. How could this be achieved?

Evolutionary roots

We do not need to know the intricate details of the cancer cells’ innards to figure out how their overall behaviour might be controlled. It is well known that cells regulate the action of genes not just as a result of chemical signals, but because of the physical properties of their micro-environment. They can sense forces such as shear stresses and the elasticity of nearby tissue. They are also responsive to temperature, electric fields, pH, pressure and oxygen concentration. All these variables offer opportunities for intervening and stabilising widespread cancer cells. For example, a few doctors are attempting to treat cancer using hyperbaric oxygen therapy, where the patient is placed in a chamber of high-pressure pure oxygen, which affects cancer cell metabolism.

We also need to involve other kinds of biologists in cancer research - after all, cancer is widespread among mammals, fish, reptiles, even plants. Clearly it is an integral part of the evolutionary story of multicellular life over the last billion years.

Most normal cells seem to come pre-loaded with a “cancer subroutine” that can be triggered by a variety of insults, and we need to understand the evolutionary origin of this just as much as the triggering mechanisms. In addition, it has long been recognised that there are many similarities between cancer and embryo development, and evidence is mounting that some genes expressed during embryogenesis get re-awakened in cancer.

Right now, the huge cancer research programme is long on technical data, but short on understanding. By reshaping the conceptual landscape, we may at last see how to make serious inroads into tackling a much- feared disease that touches every family on the planet.

Jan 8
biocanvas:

A magnified view of human embryonic stem cells.
Image by Melanie Ivancic, Joseph Klim, and Laura Kiessling, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

biocanvas:

A magnified view of human embryonic stem cells.

Image by Melanie Ivancic, Joseph Klim, and Laura Kiessling, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

somersault1824:

It has been a long time, but here is again some of our own work :) Hope you like it!It is a E9.5 mouse embryo.We could only do this thanks to the amazing people at emouseatlas (http://www.emouseatlas.org/)
more scientific illustrations
follow us on Facebook 

somersault1824:

It has been a long time, but here is again some of our own work :) Hope you like it!
It is a E9.5 mouse embryo.
We could only do this thanks to the amazing people at emouseatlas (http://www.emouseatlas.org/)

more scientific illustrations

follow us on Facebook 

ohyeahdevelopmentalbiology:

Heterochromia (also known as a heterochromia iridis or heterochromia iridium) is an ocular condition in which one iris is a different color from the other iris (complete heterochromia), or where the part of one iris is a different color from the remainder (partial heterochromia or sectoral heterochromia). It is a result of the relative excess or lack of pigment within an iris or part of an iris, which may be inherited or acquired by disease or injury. This uncommon condition usually results due to uneven melanin content. A number of causes are responsible, including genetic, such as chimerism, Horners Syndrome and Waardenburg syndrome.

ohyeahdevelopmentalbiology:

Heterochromia (also known as a heterochromia iridis or heterochromia iridium) is an ocular condition in which one iris is a different color from the other iris (complete heterochromia), or where the part of one iris is a different color from the remainder (partial heterochromia or sectoral heterochromia). It is a result of the relative excess or lack of pigment within an iris or part of an iris, which may be inherited or acquired by disease or injury. This uncommon condition usually results due to uneven melanin content. A number of causes are responsible, including genetic, such as chimerism, Horners Syndrome and Waardenburg syndrome.


ohyeahdevelopmentalbiology:

Depictions of chick developmental anatomy. (A) Dorsal view (looking “down” at what will become the back) of a 2-day chick embryo, as depicted by Marcello Malpighi in 1672. (B) Ventral view (looking “up” at the prospective belly) of a chick embryo at a similar stage, seen through a dissecting microscope and rendered by F. R. Lillie in 1908. (C) Eduard d’Alton’s depiction of a later stage 2-day chick embryo in Pander (1817). (D) Modern rendering of a 3-day chick embryo. Details of the anatomy will be discussed in later chapters. (A from Malpighi 1672; B from Lillie 1908; C from Pander 1817, courtesy of Ernst Mayr Library of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard; D after Carlson 1981.)

ohyeahdevelopmentalbiology:

Depictions of chick developmental anatomy. (A) Dorsal view (looking “down” at what will become the back) of a 2-day chick embryo, as depicted by Marcello Malpighi in 1672. (B) Ventral view (looking “up” at the prospective belly) of a chick embryo at a similar stage, seen through a dissecting microscope and rendered by F. R. Lillie in 1908. (C) Eduard d’Alton’s depiction of a later stage 2-day chick embryo in Pander (1817). (D) Modern rendering of a 3-day chick embryo. Details of the anatomy will be discussed in later chapters. (A from Malpighi 1672; B from Lillie 1908; C from Pander 1817, courtesy of Ernst Mayr Library of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard; D after Carlson 1981.)

frontal-cortex:

Starfish development
Seven successive stages of earlier starfish development, precursors of the juvenile shown above. Increasing in age from left to right and top to bottom. The first three specimens are embryos, and the last three are larvae, with the fourth being transitional between the two. Many tube feet are visible in the oldest specimen (lower right).
Composite image. Reflected light, stereomicroscope. The image is quite incredible looking when viewed in full, IMO.
by Sharon Minsuk

frontal-cortex:

Starfish development

Seven successive stages of earlier starfish development, precursors of the juvenile shown above. Increasing in age from left to right and top to bottom. The first three specimens are embryos, and the last three are larvae, with the fourth being transitional between the two. Many tube feet are visible in the oldest specimen (lower right).

Composite image. Reflected light, stereomicroscope. The image is quite incredible looking when viewed in full, IMO.

by Sharon Minsuk